Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 49819 for our.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 49819 for our.
[PDF]
Harold Carlson Trust v. St. Croix County
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2539 - 2017-09-19
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2539 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Thompson
. After our independent review, we agree. Section 973.15(2), Stats., provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
. After our independent review, we agree. Section 973.15(2), Stats., provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
Our review of an order denying a motion to suppress is mixed. We uphold the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116672 - 2014-07-15
Our review of an order denying a motion to suppress is mixed. We uphold the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116672 - 2014-07-15
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
12, 2000, the supreme court summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2312 - 2005-03-31
12, 2000, the supreme court summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and our independent review of the record as required by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117324 - 2017-09-21
of the report and our independent review of the record as required by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 4 Our decision also warrants denial of McPhetridge’s motions for relief pending appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26823 - 2014-09-15
. 4 Our decision also warrants denial of McPhetridge’s motions for relief pending appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26823 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of relief available to Booker is a discretionary reversal. Unfortunately, our discretionary reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40440 - 2014-09-15
of relief available to Booker is a discretionary reversal. Unfortunately, our discretionary reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40440 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Haskell directs our attention to State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 699-700, 551 N.W.2d 841 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541316 - 2022-07-07
Haskell directs our attention to State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 699-700, 551 N.W.2d 841 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541316 - 2022-07-07
CA Blank Order
. A challenge to Wehinger’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133769 - 2015-01-25
. A challenge to Wehinger’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentencing determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133769 - 2015-01-25