Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 74688 for public records.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 74688 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was contradicted by the record. Nos. 2022AP1765-CR 2022AP1766-CR 4 ¶8 Yancey now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845139 - 2024-09-04
was contradicted by the record. Nos. 2022AP1765-CR 2022AP1766-CR 4 ¶8 Yancey now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845139 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
on an existing substandard legal lot or parcel of record in the county register of deeds office before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56142 - 2014-09-15
on an existing substandard legal lot or parcel of record in the county register of deeds office before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56142 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert J. Capps
a response. Based on our review of the no merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
a response. Based on our review of the no merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We have considered the no-merit report, and we have conducted an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
. We have considered the no-merit report, and we have conducted an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
State v. Robert J. Capps
a response. Based on our review of the no merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
a response. Based on our review of the no merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
by the record” because, he contends, “no facts were offered to support a finding that the serious juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
by the record” because, he contends, “no facts were offered to support a finding that the serious juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We have considered the no-merit report, and we have conducted an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
. We have considered the no-merit report, and we have conducted an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Perry P. Lieuallen
(a) hereof, shall also be maintained. All trust account records shall be deemed to have public aspects
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16446 - 2017-09-21
(a) hereof, shall also be maintained. All trust account records shall be deemed to have public aspects
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16446 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Raymond J. Rappa
erroneously based his sentence in part on evidence not in the record. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5325 - 2017-09-19
erroneously based his sentence in part on evidence not in the record. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5325 - 2017-09-19
State v. Trina J.
vacating a previous order that had vacated an oral order, recorded on the judgment roll, terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10923 - 2005-03-31
vacating a previous order that had vacated an oral order, recorded on the judgment roll, terminating her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10923 - 2005-03-31