Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 12361 - 12370 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
Iggens, was appointed to represent Schlitt. The case was eventually tried on November 1, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31
Iggens, was appointed to represent Schlitt. The case was eventually tried on November 1, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
after he pled guilty to eight counts in two separate cases:1 (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29468 - 2014-09-15
after he pled guilty to eight counts in two separate cases:1 (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29468 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel B. Knutson
and therefore affirm. The pertinent evidence in this case is undisputed. The evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11157 - 2005-03-31
and therefore affirm. The pertinent evidence in this case is undisputed. The evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
grams during a search of Butschle’s car. A blood test revealed a restricted controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798443 - 2024-05-08
grams during a search of Butschle’s car. A blood test revealed a restricted controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798443 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
to represent Schlitt. The case was eventually tried on November 1, 1994. Williams testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
to represent Schlitt. The case was eventually tried on November 1, 1994. Williams testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel B. Knutson
-2- The pertinent evidence in this case is undisputed. The evidence presented to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11157 - 2017-09-19
-2- The pertinent evidence in this case is undisputed. The evidence presented to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11157 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
cases:[1] (1) possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (marijuana), more than 2500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
cases:[1] (1) possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (marijuana), more than 2500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or unduly intrusive searches and seizures, and the interests of the State to effectively prevent, detect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226507 - 2018-11-07
or unduly intrusive searches and seizures, and the interests of the State to effectively prevent, detect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226507 - 2018-11-07
[PDF]
State v. Brian Hibl
2006 WI 52 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP2936-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25281 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI 52 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP2936-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25281 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian Hibl
2006 WI 52 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP2936-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25281 - 2006-05-25
2006 WI 52 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP2936-CR Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25281 - 2006-05-25