Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12371 - 12380 of 31177 for WA 0852 2611 9277 RAB Interior Kamar Nuansa Coklat Apartemen Casa de Parco Tangerang.

Barron County v. Vicki L. Buchner
. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value the opinion of the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4542 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Sefton
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Fields, 2000 WI App 218, ¶9, 239 Wis. 2d 38, 619
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4477 - 2017-09-19

State v. Tony G. Merriweather
this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. To prove deficient performance, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12558 - 2005-03-31

Richard Herbert Voigt v. City of Merrill
de novo. See Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). Immunity exists when the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4304 - 2005-03-31

State v. Corey L. Wilkins
. Whether information constitutes new factors for sentencing is a question of law that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8407 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel T. Van Ornum
N.W.2d 830 (1990). We review the trial court’s conclusion of constitutional reasonableness de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16090 - 2017-09-21

State v. Derrick Wilder
(1996). We review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search complied with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10563 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The court found Sonnenberg guilty of first-offense OWI. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Williams, 241 Wis. 2d 631, ¶18. II. Reasonable Suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222919 - 2018-10-18

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
in a case is sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict is a question of law that the court reviews de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039532 - 2025-11-19