Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12371 - 12380 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 12371 - 12380 of 64042 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment was inappropriate because the record viewed in the light most favorable to West Bend raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64062 - 2011-05-16
judgment was inappropriate because the record viewed in the light most favorable to West Bend raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64062 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 supplemental no-merit report, and upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887883 - 2024-12-10
-CRNM 2 supplemental no-merit report, and upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887883 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
his right to trial before entering a plea. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94535 - 2014-09-15
his right to trial before entering a plea. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94535 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ying N.V.
if the record reflects that the juvenile court exercised its discretion and there was a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5722 - 2005-03-31
if the record reflects that the juvenile court exercised its discretion and there was a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5722 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentence meted out to one of his co-actors. Because the record shows that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34136 - 2008-09-29
the sentence meted out to one of his co-actors. Because the record shows that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34136 - 2008-09-29
Joseph R. Parenteau v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. “The question is not whether there is credible evidence in the record to sustain a finding the commission did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3664 - 2005-03-31
. “The question is not whether there is credible evidence in the record to sustain a finding the commission did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stated on the record,” there was no substantial change in circumstances to warrant a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201519 - 2017-11-15
stated on the record,” there was no substantial change in circumstances to warrant a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201519 - 2017-11-15
CA Blank Order
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134234 - 2015-02-02
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134234 - 2015-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
was an improper reference to facts outside of the record because neither victim testified that they actually saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29996 - 2007-08-15
was an improper reference to facts outside of the record because neither victim testified that they actually saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29996 - 2007-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806514 - 2024-05-29
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806514 - 2024-05-29