Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12381 - 12390 of 72758 for we.
Search results 12381 - 12390 of 72758 for we.
[PDF]
State v. Jon P. Cantwell
in the interest of justice. We reject Cantwell’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND On the morning of May 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11410 - 2017-09-19
in the interest of justice. We reject Cantwell’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND On the morning of May 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11410 - 2017-09-19
Jay Richard Sorensen v. Terri Lynn Schnorr-Sorensen
the nonmarital and marital estate was not fully tried. We conclude that the property division is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13328 - 2005-03-31
the nonmarital and marital estate was not fully tried. We conclude that the property division is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13328 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
drawn, protects his victims and the public, and furthers McConochie’s rehabilitative needs, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
drawn, protects his victims and the public, and furthers McConochie’s rehabilitative needs, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258444 - 2020-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Sandy Pegues
a circuit court order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20983 - 2017-09-21
a circuit court order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20983 - 2017-09-21
State v. Virginia R. Ray
was sufficient to conclude that Ray was in violation of “having her [cats] enter on the Dombeck property.” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5723 - 2005-03-31
was sufficient to conclude that Ray was in violation of “having her [cats] enter on the Dombeck property.” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5723 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
failure to repair his front porch. He argues we should vacate the jury’s verdicts and grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
failure to repair his front porch. He argues we should vacate the jury’s verdicts and grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bernhard K. Benn v. Larry L. Vitort
and costs under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25. We affirm the judgment and remand for determination of attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5637 - 2017-09-19
and costs under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25. We affirm the judgment and remand for determination of attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5637 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bryan Gary
) the State breached the plea agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
) the State breached the plea agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
[PDF]
State v. Bryan Gary
agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea was unknowing. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19309 - 2017-09-21
agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea was unknowing. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19309 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24