Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12381 - 12390 of 20943 for word.
Search results 12381 - 12390 of 20943 for word.
Lilie-Jean Awsumb v. David A. Thompson
different things in ordinary speech. It is thus a word that depends on context to remove ambiguity. Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7312 - 2005-03-31
different things in ordinary speech. It is thus a word that depends on context to remove ambiguity. Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7312 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the words and actions of the parties). It is clear from the facts in Kostich that an attorney-client
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
the words and actions of the parties). It is clear from the facts in Kostich that an attorney-client
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—.” Counsel then concluded his first statement with the words “is conscionable.” The court continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511866 - 2022-04-19
—.” Counsel then concluded his first statement with the words “is conscionable.” The court continued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511866 - 2022-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
interest of justice factors. In other words, Miller does not state that, if at least three of the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82225 - 2012-05-07
interest of justice factors. In other words, Miller does not state that, if at least three of the five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82225 - 2012-05-07
State v. Kevin Brown
§ 973.15(5). [7] An alternate reason why Brown is entitled to sentencing credit is the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21376 - 2006-03-22
§ 973.15(5). [7] An alternate reason why Brown is entitled to sentencing credit is the wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21376 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 971.14. In other words, subsec. (2)(f) does not apply to a defendant who is not presently ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407378 - 2021-08-10
§ 971.14. In other words, subsec. (2)(f) does not apply to a defendant who is not presently ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407378 - 2021-08-10
State v. Willie M. Kendricks
to each checked “guilty” box. Thus, although the words spoken at the plea colloquy, standing alone, do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5177 - 2005-03-31
to each checked “guilty” box. Thus, although the words spoken at the plea colloquy, standing alone, do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5177 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
406, 412, 599 N.W.2d 893 (Ct. App. 1999), and to have chosen its words carefully, Ball v. District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4579 - 2017-09-19
406, 412, 599 N.W.2d 893 (Ct. App. 1999), and to have chosen its words carefully, Ball v. District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Erland Anderson v. Dale Peterson
, it must be “signed” a word which includes any authentication which identifies the party to be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14608 - 2017-09-21
, it must be “signed” a word which includes any authentication which identifies the party to be charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14608 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
S.J.A.J. v. First Things First
“The construction of words and phrases in insurance policies is generally a matter of law and is controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15194 - 2017-09-21
“The construction of words and phrases in insurance policies is generally a matter of law and is controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15194 - 2017-09-21