Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 98586 for civil court case status online.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 98586 for civil court case status online.
Frontsheet
2007 WI 68 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP1181-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29319 - 2007-06-06
2007 WI 68 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP1181-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29319 - 2007-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954673 - 2025-05-08
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954673 - 2025-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 92 Wis. 2d 407, 284 N.W.2d 674 (1979). In that case, the wife’s attorney informed the court during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374518 - 2021-06-08
, 92 Wis. 2d 407, 284 N.W.2d 674 (1979). In that case, the wife’s attorney informed the court during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374518 - 2021-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
In civil cases, our supreme court has explained that retroactive application is presumed. Wenke v. Gehl Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75591 - 2011-12-21
In civil cases, our supreme court has explained that retroactive application is presumed. Wenke v. Gehl Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75591 - 2011-12-21
[PDF]
WI 37
election ballot. The case is before this court on bypass of the court of appeals pursuant to WIS. STAT
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=856925 - 2024-09-27
election ballot. The case is before this court on bypass of the court of appeals pursuant to WIS. STAT
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=856925 - 2024-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 3, 2008 David R. Schanker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 3, 2008 David R. Schanker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02
[MS WORD]
IW-1610: Petition for Protection or Services (Chapter 48) - Indian Child Welfare Act
2 Petition for Protection or Services (Chapter 48) Page 3 of 2 Case No. STATE
/formdisplay/IW-1610.doc?formNumber=IW-1610&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-19
2 Petition for Protection or Services (Chapter 48) Page 3 of 2 Case No. STATE
/formdisplay/IW-1610.doc?formNumber=IW-1610&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
in this paternity case and in the earlier small claims matters all currently pending on appeal.” The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6110 - 2017-09-19
in this paternity case and in the earlier small claims matters all currently pending on appeal.” The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6110 - 2017-09-19
Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
case and in the earlier small claims matters all currently pending on appeal.” The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6110 - 2005-03-31
case and in the earlier small claims matters all currently pending on appeal.” The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6110 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen E. Lee
judgment of conviction was valid. No statute or case holds that a trial court must segregate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5946 - 2017-09-19
judgment of conviction was valid. No statute or case holds that a trial court must segregate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5946 - 2017-09-19