Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 16449 for commentating.

State v. William F. Hughes
enhancement. After lengthy comments explaining the factors it was taking into account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14058 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
(1979) (In closing arguments, a “prosecutor may comment on the evidence, detail the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89341 - 2012-11-13

James E. Vieau v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
only to liability policies, not indemnity insurance”—without comment. Mau, 248 Wis. 2d 1031, ¶30. Mau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7527 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
basis for the pleas, and Packer’s comments to the PSI agent and at sentencing further demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17

Michael S. Elkins v. Shawn B. Schneider
findings. In the February 12 comments, the court found that the actions were commenced with the intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4821 - 2005-03-31

Oneida County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
deputized employees, aside from the chief deputy, were subject to MERA. See id. Any comments about chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2280 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, it chose to make “several comments” on the merits of Close’s arguments. The court stated any erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115293 - 2014-06-23

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
. A trial court’s comments at the postconviction hearing may establish that the trial court was aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70793 - 2011-09-12

2008 WI App 142
school together. This comment was made to the court outside the presence of the jury after LaGosh had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33704 - 2008-09-23

2007 WI APP 144
. ¶20 That said, we think this issue warrants supreme court comment at some point in the future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29220 - 2007-06-26