Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Terry and Cathy Laube v. City of Owen
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984). The plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11456 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Fouse, 120 Wis.2d 471, 476, 355 N.W.2d 366, 369 (Ct. App. 1984). The plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11456 - 2005-03-31
Mary Fredette v. Wood County National Bank
support a conclusion of frivolousness under § 814.025 is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8713 - 2005-03-31
support a conclusion of frivolousness under § 814.025 is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8713 - 2005-03-31
Carl G. Nordholm v. Herlache Industrial Supply Co., Inc.
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5239 - 2005-03-31
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald R. MacClymont v. Harriet J. Gilligan
by the trial court satisfy the legal standard for unjust enrichment is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
by the trial court satisfy the legal standard for unjust enrichment is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven W. Anderson
facts to the law will be reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶17, __ Wis. 2d __, 646 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5136 - 2005-03-31
facts to the law will be reviewed de novo. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶17, __ Wis. 2d __, 646 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). These are “questions of law we review de novo.” Vidmar, 372 Wis. 2d 701, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771082 - 2024-03-05
). These are “questions of law we review de novo.” Vidmar, 372 Wis. 2d 701, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771082 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9964 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as a circuit court. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017327 - 2025-10-02
reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as a circuit court. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017327 - 2025-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131343 - 2017-09-21
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131343 - 2017-09-21