Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Michael J. Grohskopf
to a preliminary breath screening test (PBT). The trial court held that a lower level of probable cause than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11515 - 2017-09-19
to a preliminary breath screening test (PBT). The trial court held that a lower level of probable cause than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11515 - 2017-09-19
City of Sheboygan v. Michael J. Grohskopf
Grohskopf to submit to a preliminary breath screening test (PBT). The trial court held that a lower level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11515 - 2005-03-31
Grohskopf to submit to a preliminary breath screening test (PBT). The trial court held that a lower level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen R. Stocki
-CR 2 right to an alternative chemical test. The trial court made a credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20824 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 right to an alternative chemical test. The trial court made a credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
for refusing to submit to breath testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
for refusing to submit to breath testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
State v. Stephen R. Stocki
argued that he had been impermissibly denied his right to an alternative chemical test. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20824 - 2006-01-03
argued that he had been impermissibly denied his right to an alternative chemical test. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20824 - 2006-01-03
State v. Milton H. Smith
refused to submit to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
refused to submit to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Niebuhr
driving privileges for refusal to submit to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3546 - 2017-09-19
driving privileges for refusal to submit to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3546 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preliminary breath test (PBT) 2 on the basis that the officer who administered the test lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21
preliminary breath test (PBT) 2 on the basis that the officer who administered the test lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Milton H. Smith
to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion for relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15286 - 2017-09-21
to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion for relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15286 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert C. Niebuhr
to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS ΒΆ2 On September 25, 1999, Niebuhr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31
to a breath test. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS ΒΆ2 On September 25, 1999, Niebuhr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3546 - 2005-03-31