Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 72758 for we.
Search results 12391 - 12400 of 72758 for we.
State v. Bryan Gary
) the State breached the plea agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
) the State breached the plea agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
[PDF]
State v. Bryan Gary
agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea was unknowing. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19309 - 2017-09-21
agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea was unknowing. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19309 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24
State v. John J. Watson
on the sexual-motivation issue. We conclude that it did not. We therefore reverse the court’s ruling
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8931 - 2005-03-31
on the sexual-motivation issue. We conclude that it did not. We therefore reverse the court’s ruling
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
procedure for vetoing the ordinance change. Because we conclude the Town substantially complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46056 - 2014-09-15
procedure for vetoing the ordinance change. Because we conclude the Town substantially complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46056 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and she appeals from the order granting summary judgment to the City of New Berlin. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115439 - 2014-07-01
, and she appeals from the order granting summary judgment to the City of New Berlin. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115439 - 2014-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are procedurally barred or otherwise precluded by the law of the case doctrine. We agree and, therefore, affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236611 - 2019-03-05
are procedurally barred or otherwise precluded by the law of the case doctrine. We agree and, therefore, affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236611 - 2019-03-05
[PDF]
WI App 31
court of personal jurisdiction because it was a mere technical defect. We agree with Flanagan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650417 - 2023-07-12
court of personal jurisdiction because it was a mere technical defect. We agree with Flanagan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650417 - 2023-07-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. We conclude the record adequately shows Behnke’s waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2008-02-04
. We conclude the record adequately shows Behnke’s waiver was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2008-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
the transcript of the original sentencing. We conclude that resentencing is not warranted because the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
the transcript of the original sentencing. We conclude that resentencing is not warranted because the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08