Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1241 - 1250 of 83470 for case code.

[PDF] May a judge purchase common stock of a Wisconsin corporation that could be involved in future litigation before the court in which the judge serves?
. The corporation has been involved in eight cases within the judge's jurisdiction during the last 20 years
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the administrative code in determining that Toohey could accept his “earnest money”; (2) the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196379 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
… appl[ies] in this case. 7 WISCONSIN ADMIN. CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] Nina Kennedy v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8933 - 2017-09-19

Maranatha Baptist Church v. City of Phillips
. The trial court held that the church was a permitted use under the City's commercial zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13169 - 2005-03-31

Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah(Khan) v. Daniel Bertrand
test is a violation of Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.59(2), Kahn was given a conduct report notifying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11890 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
regulation under pertinent provisions of West Allis’s municipal code. Tee & Bee appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14732 - 2017-09-21

Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
Allis’s municipal code. Tee & Bee appeals from the trial court order denying its motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14732 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Must a judge testify when subpoenaed?
Federal sexual harassment case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
of the Motor Vehicle Code’s intoxicated driver statutes. The circuit court denied Hill’s motion.[2] Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111774 - 2014-05-06