Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1241 - 1250 of 69415 for he.
Search results 1241 - 1250 of 69415 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
he states is “Marcōlō Vōn Capōeira.” Because Smith’s motion fails to provide any support for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36795 - 2009-07-28
he states is “Marcōlō Vōn Capōeira.” Because Smith’s motion fails to provide any support for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36795 - 2009-07-28
State v. Kirby J. Krueger
to withdraw his no contest plea to one count of burglary, contrary to § 943.10(1)(a), Stats. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13919 - 2005-03-31
to withdraw his no contest plea to one count of burglary, contrary to § 943.10(1)(a), Stats. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13919 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Gatt
of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13938 - 2014-09-15
of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13938 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated, fourth offense. He asserts 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75482 - 2014-09-15
intoxicated, fourth offense. He asserts 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75482 - 2014-09-15
State v. John A. Gatt
of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13938 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Jeffrey Wittenberger testified that at approximately 2:38 a.m. on Saturday, January 27, 2007, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35216 - 2014-09-15
Jeffrey Wittenberger testified that at approximately 2:38 a.m. on Saturday, January 27, 2007, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35216 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] Douglas Richer appeals a judgment of conviction for operating while intoxicated, fourth offense. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75482 - 2013-08-29
] Douglas Richer appeals a judgment of conviction for operating while intoxicated, fourth offense. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75482 - 2013-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), fourth offense, entered after a jury trial. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968946 - 2025-06-11
a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), fourth offense, entered after a jury trial. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968946 - 2025-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to sufficiently prove a material breach. Alternatively, Brust argues he is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37049 - 2009-07-06
to sufficiently prove a material breach. Alternatively, Brust argues he is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37049 - 2009-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
because the State failed to sufficiently prove a material breach. Alternatively, Brust argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37049 - 2014-09-15
because the State failed to sufficiently prove a material breach. Alternatively, Brust argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37049 - 2014-09-15