Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2011-12)[3]. We review de novo the circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply the governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22
) (2011-12)[3]. We review de novo the circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply the governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131986 - 2014-12-22
State v. Ryan C. Krupp
which we review de novo, construing the joinder statute broadly in favor of the initial joinder. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5986 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo, construing the joinder statute broadly in favor of the initial joinder. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5986 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. I, § 7. Whether admission of evidence violates an accused’s right to confrontation is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117121 - 2014-07-14
. I, § 7. Whether admission of evidence violates an accused’s right to confrontation is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117121 - 2014-07-14
State v. Arnold E. Lounsbury
facts, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319, 321, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
facts, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319, 321, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Chippewa Falls v. Town of Hallie
presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15316 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15316 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of instructions on lesser included offenses is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilson, 149
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32132 - 2014-09-15
of instructions on lesser included offenses is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilson, 149
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
information is an issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶8 Evanich claims that the PSI gave inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
information is an issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶8 Evanich claims that the PSI gave inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review de novo. Id. ¶4 Earl was represented at trial by Attorney Jeffrey Jensen. Earl first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Id. ¶4 Earl was represented at trial by Attorney Jeffrey Jensen. Earl first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶6 To be entitled to resentencing, Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107984 - 2017-09-21
court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶6 To be entitled to resentencing, Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107984 - 2017-09-21