Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 44395 for name change.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 44395 for name change.
[PDF]
NOTICE
previously held that a post-sentencing change in the law is not a new factor for purposes of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55206 - 2014-09-15
previously held that a post-sentencing change in the law is not a new factor for purposes of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55206 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not established a substantial change in circumstances requiring a reduction in the maintenance award. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66434 - 2014-09-15
not established a substantial change in circumstances requiring a reduction in the maintenance award. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66434 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that a change in sentencing legislation seven years before he was sentenced constitutes a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94909 - 2013-04-08
argues that a change in sentencing legislation seven years before he was sentenced constitutes a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94909 - 2013-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. The supreme court has previously held that a post-sentencing change in the law is not a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55206 - 2010-10-04
. The supreme court has previously held that a post-sentencing change in the law is not a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55206 - 2010-10-04
COURT OF APPEALS
when it determined that Michael had not established a substantial change in circumstances requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66434 - 2011-06-22
when it determined that Michael had not established a substantial change in circumstances requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66434 - 2011-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
that Nelson-Hooker had established a substantial change in circumstances by showing that Hooker hit his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90737 - 2012-12-17
that Nelson-Hooker had established a substantial change in circumstances by showing that Hooker hit his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90737 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
98-1878.PDF
and Snyder, JJ. No. 98-1878 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. This is an appeal from an order changing an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14210 - 2014-09-15
and Snyder, JJ. No. 98-1878 2 ¶1 SNYDER, J. This is an appeal from an order changing an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14210 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 184
that Arends’ behavior had changed as an adult. She concluded that Arends was not “more likely than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34606 - 2014-09-15
that Arends’ behavior had changed as an adult. She concluded that Arends was not “more likely than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34606 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 184
is “quite debatable.” She relied heavily on the fact that Arends’ behavior had changed as an adult. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34606 - 2011-06-14
is “quite debatable.” She relied heavily on the fact that Arends’ behavior had changed as an adult. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34606 - 2011-06-14
[MS WORD]
GN-3370: Consent to Serve as Conservator
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF Name
/formdisplay/GN-3370.doc?formNumber=GN-3370&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-02-27
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF Name
/formdisplay/GN-3370.doc?formNumber=GN-3370&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-02-27