Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 65394 for or b.

State v. Markham O. Mayne
not err, we affirm. ¶2 Mayne was charged under Wis. Stat. § 940.31(1)(b) (1995-96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16256 - 2005-03-31

James Munroe v. Dykstra
(3), contrasted with that of subsections (4)(b) and (5m), demonstrated the legislature’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11628 - 2005-03-31

Village of Waunakee v. Donald Maier
County: Michael B. Torphy, JR., Judge. Affirmed. DEININGER, J.[1] Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11463 - 2005-03-31

State v. John W. Knoppe
alcohol concentration, § 346.63(1)(b), by State Trooper Dean R. Luhman. Knoppe filed a motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13304 - 2005-03-31

Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
addressed placement modification and visitation. Wisconsin Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(b) (1997-98),[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15711 - 2005-03-31

Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
addressed placement modification and visitation. Wisconsin Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(b) (1997-98),[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15712 - 2005-03-31

Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for the ascertainment of the truth. (b) Avoid needless consumption of time. (c) Protect witnesses from harassment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31590 - 2007-10-15

COURT OF APPEALS
; and (2) bail jumping. See Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)1r., 961.48, 946.49(1)(b) (2007-08).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48771 - 2007-02-21

Michael F. Lanois v. Eye Communication Systems, Inc.
of the availability of an independent review. Sec. 632.835(2)(b). ECS claims that it was under no legal duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19800 - 2005-10-04