Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 50071 for our.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Michael Hill
court considered the sentencing factors and acknowledged that others were involved. On appeal, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10821 - 2017-09-20
court considered the sentencing factors and acknowledged that others were involved. On appeal, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10821 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132791 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our No. 2019AP2087-CR 2 review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420196 - 2021-09-08
upon our No. 2019AP2087-CR 2 review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420196 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 199 Wis. 2d 566, 571, 544 N.W.2d 574 (1996) (citation omitted). Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638662 - 2023-03-28
, 199 Wis. 2d 566, 571, 544 N.W.2d 574 (1996) (citation omitted). Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638662 - 2023-03-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218679 - 2018-09-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218679 - 2018-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209203 - 2018-03-07
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209203 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He further contends that he is entitled to discretionary reversal. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
. He further contends that he is entitled to discretionary reversal. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166258 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
assistance of counsel. Our review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that these potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138362 - 2015-03-31
assistance of counsel. Our review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that these potential issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138362 - 2015-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
of costs on appeal. The court awarded $3567.35 in costs against Morters. The supreme court reversed our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Romaine A. Langham
of the material statute as applied to facts that no one disputes. Thus, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25668 - 2017-09-21
of the material statute as applied to facts that no one disputes. Thus, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25668 - 2017-09-21