Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12411 - 12420 of 73644 for we.

COURT OF APPEALS
sentence and his motion for relief from postconviction orders entered in 2006. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20

Barron County v. Brian T.
Brian cannot possibly comply. We conclude that the court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4621 - 2005-03-31

Barron County v. Brian T.
Brian cannot possibly comply. We conclude that the court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4620 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s no-merit report and letter, and Cortese’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102330 - 2013-10-01

[PDF] NOTICE
, the major question is whether we should construe the agreement to mean that the seller agreed to sell all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28160 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
reversible error during the jury’s deliberations. Because we conclude that any error committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert Fecke
conviction should be reversed in the interest of justice. We reject each of Fecke’s claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5366 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
be wholly frivolous. We directed counsel to address whether there would be arguable merit to any argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18

State v. Teng Vang
when it denied his motion. We conclude the court failed to exercise its discretion because it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21456 - 2006-02-21

COURT OF APPEALS
his crime was committed) and because he did not raise this issue during his criminal case, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36795 - 2009-07-28