Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12421 - 12430 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP717 2 petition and his postcommitment motion for a new trial. 2 Tran argues he is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196454 - 2017-09-21

State v. Steven B. Post
in the trial court, which was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Post appeals from the judgment and both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16145 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kurt A. Loewen
of "constitutional fact" which we review without deference to the trial court. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kurt A. Loewen
of "constitutional fact" which we review without deference to the trial court. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8210 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
surcharge imposed as a condition of his sentence. The issues are whether the trial court failed to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42670 - 2009-10-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. Hudson seeks a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64335 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Douglas T. Meyer
information; (3) the trial court failed to warn Meyer that the court did not have to impose the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3811 - 2017-09-20

State v. Darnell Stevens
. In the no merit report, counsel first discusses whether the trial court erred when it refused to allow Stevens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8502 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dale A. Gleffe v. Romayne R. Gleffe
the petition for divorce was filed. Romayne argues that the evidence does not support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4524 - 2017-09-19

Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. Teresa B.
. ANDERSON, P.J. Teresa B. and John S. appeal from an order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10158 - 2005-03-31