Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12431 - 12440 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12431 - 12440 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1986); Rhodes, 336 Wis. 2d 64, ¶28. We review his challenge de novo. See State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
(1986); Rhodes, 336 Wis. 2d 64, ¶28. We review his challenge de novo. See State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104188 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103082 - 2013-10-14
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Folkman v. Quamme, 2003 WI 116, ¶12, 264 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103082 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548358 - 2022-07-27
, and review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548358 - 2022-07-27
[PDF]
WI APP 71
This appeal requires us to interpret the statutes regarding good time and sentence credit. We apply de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146979 - 2017-09-21
This appeal requires us to interpret the statutes regarding good time and sentence credit. We apply de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146979 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steve Norton
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
complaint with prejudice. Selgren appeals. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
complaint with prejudice. Selgren appeals. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mitchel P.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19537 - 2005-09-06
[PDF]
James F. Karls v. David P. Geraghty
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Springs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12666 - 2017-09-21
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Springs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5 Randle alleged that he did not raise this issue previously because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15
of Escalona bar is reviewed de novo). ¶5 Randle alleged that he did not raise this issue previously because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36431 - 2014-09-15
Jessica L. Edwardson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of law that we review de novo. See First Nat’l Bank v. Wernhart, 204 Wis. 2d 361, 367, 555 N.W.2d 819
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16086 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See First Nat’l Bank v. Wernhart, 204 Wis. 2d 361, 367, 555 N.W.2d 819
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16086 - 2005-03-31