Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12431 - 12440 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 12431 - 12440 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to deny his postconviction motion without a hearing based on his allegation that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692962 - 2023-08-22
decision to deny his postconviction motion without a hearing based on his allegation that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692962 - 2023-08-22
State v. Donny Rogers
. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial for murder, the State of Wisconsin wants to introduce an inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7968 - 2005-03-31
. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial for murder, the State of Wisconsin wants to introduce an inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7968 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial; and (2) new evidence exists warranting a new trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
trial; and (2) new evidence exists warranting a new trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
State v. Donny Rogers
. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. BROWN, J. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7968 - 2017-09-19
. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. BROWN, J. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7968 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to withdraw his guilty pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22
is entitled to withdraw his guilty pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22
State v. Jeremy Armstrong
. See Wis. Stat. § 940.02 (1995-96).[1] Armstrong argues: (1) that the trial court erred in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14178 - 2014-05-06
. See Wis. Stat. § 940.02 (1995-96).[1] Armstrong argues: (1) that the trial court erred in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14178 - 2014-05-06
2008 WI App 181
nuisance found by the jury. In addition, the City argues that a partial new trial should be granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34709 - 2011-06-14
nuisance found by the jury. In addition, the City argues that a partial new trial should be granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34709 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI App 181
by the jury. In addition, the City argues that a partial new trial should be granted to remedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34709 - 2014-09-15
by the jury. In addition, the City argues that a partial new trial should be granted to remedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34709 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
John E. Isom v. Jeffrey Endicott
Because Isom has an adequate remedy at law in another pending appeal, the trial court was correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
Because Isom has an adequate remedy at law in another pending appeal, the trial court was correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Vest, Jr.
his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are whether the trial court No. 97-1479-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12511 - 2017-09-21
his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are whether the trial court No. 97-1479-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12511 - 2017-09-21