Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12431 - 12440 of 20929 for word.
Search results 12431 - 12440 of 20929 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the deputy’s sight.” In other words, Billips argues that because Kinservik had already removed some evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71784 - 2011-10-04
of the deputy’s sight.” In other words, Billips argues that because Kinservik had already removed some evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71784 - 2011-10-04
State v. James E. Janssen
. Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 328 (1987). In other words, if there is no search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
. Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 328 (1987). In other words, if there is no search and seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11897 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for for-profit entities, it is “organized … for pecuniary profit.” While not quite a play on words, the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31597 - 2008-01-22
for for-profit entities, it is “organized … for pecuniary profit.” While not quite a play on words, the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31597 - 2008-01-22
James E. Johnson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
or physical danger. In other words, Johnson is suggesting that the job for which he applied may not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9573 - 2005-03-31
or physical danger. In other words, Johnson is suggesting that the job for which he applied may not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9573 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to continue testifying in the State’s case-in-chief to avoid giving Kadamian “the last word” in rebuttal. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76501 - 2012-01-18
to continue testifying in the State’s case-in-chief to avoid giving Kadamian “the last word” in rebuttal. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76501 - 2012-01-18
National Operating v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
precluding the parties to the litigation.” In other words, where the judgment claimed to have preclusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2005-03-31
precluding the parties to the litigation.” In other words, where the judgment claimed to have preclusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15445 - 2005-03-31
Amber L. English v. Virgil Woodworth
of the word family, see Henderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 59 Wis. 2d 451, 457-59, 208 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
of the word family, see Henderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 59 Wis. 2d 451, 457-59, 208 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
Leea N. Power v. James M. Muhammad
the words “[s]tipulation and upon all the files.” Muhammad appeals. II. Analysis. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17971 - 2005-05-02
the words “[s]tipulation and upon all the files.” Muhammad appeals. II. Analysis. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17971 - 2005-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
from the court’s ruling on the credit card debt: [Allison] has asked the Court to take his word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30986 - 2007-11-27
from the court’s ruling on the credit card debt: [Allison] has asked the Court to take his word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30986 - 2007-11-27
State v. Jeffrey S. Gill
which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.’” Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 748 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17950 - 2005-05-03
which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.’” Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 748 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17950 - 2005-05-03