Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12441 - 12450 of 30128 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Keith Jones
on a lesser-included offense should have been given is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14140 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Melissa Frank v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
accordingly. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9080 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264312 - 2020-06-16

[PDF] NOTICE
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28019 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-Naranjo and WIS. STAT. § 974.06 is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235598 - 2019-02-19

[PDF] State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
- constitutional requirement of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 230-31, 233, 501 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 713 N.W.2d 152. Ordinarily, our review of the application and interpretation of a statute de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107790 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
for the purposes of judicial review is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶9 An administrative order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31482 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
which relief can be granted presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review. DeBruin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas G. Martwick
of constitutional fact reviewed de novo, the case upon which Kennedy relies, State v. Lange, 158 Wis.2d 609, 617
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13515 - 2005-03-31