Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12441 - 12450 of 68393 for did.
Search results 12441 - 12450 of 68393 for did.
William J. McKibbin v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
. He did not believe that any alcohol remained in his system. He attributed his falling asleep to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8552 - 2005-03-31
. He did not believe that any alcohol remained in his system. He attributed his falling asleep to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8552 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 domestic disturbance. He contends that the deputy did not have reasonable grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88805 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 domestic disturbance. He contends that the deputy did not have reasonable grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88805 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the September letter did not specify the repairs and stated “but we assume there will be no spoliation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37722 - 2009-07-15
that the September letter did not specify the repairs and stated “but we assume there will be no spoliation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37722 - 2009-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. According to Magdzas, the vehicle drifted “continuously” within its lane of travel. While the vehicle did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31485 - 2008-01-14
. According to Magdzas, the vehicle drifted “continuously” within its lane of travel. While the vehicle did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31485 - 2008-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court did not accept Jackson’s assertion that he informed his trial counsel of Stephanie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46435 - 2010-02-01
, the trial court did not accept Jackson’s assertion that he informed his trial counsel of Stephanie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46435 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Vance J. Yerke
. Despite this testimony, defense counsel did not request nor did the trial court give an alibi jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6885 - 2017-09-20
. Despite this testimony, defense counsel did not request nor did the trial court give an alibi jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6885 - 2017-09-20
State v. Herman Lundgren
(1)(a). Lundgren argues that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3915 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a). Lundgren argues that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3915 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
he made to the police, and that the circuit court did not properly exercise its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33955 - 2008-09-08
he made to the police, and that the circuit court did not properly exercise its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33955 - 2008-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
) that the circuit court was biased against him; (4) that the County was not entitled to foreclosure because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99724 - 2013-07-22
) that the circuit court was biased against him; (4) that the County was not entitled to foreclosure because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99724 - 2013-07-22
Michael R. Ott v. Wisconsin American Mutual Insurance Company
they consulted but did not call as a witness.[2] The testimony the Otts point out alluded to the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13031 - 2005-03-31
they consulted but did not call as a witness.[2] The testimony the Otts point out alluded to the possible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13031 - 2005-03-31