Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12441 - 12450 of 39849 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 12441 - 12450 of 39849 for financial disclosure statements.
COURT OF APPEALS
statements to police. We reject Lynch’s claim and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Lynch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141224 - 2015-05-05
statements to police. We reject Lynch’s claim and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Lynch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141224 - 2015-05-05
State v. Eugene Huntington
statements Jeri E. made two weeks after the last incident; (2) an expert improperly expressed an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10999 - 2005-03-31
statements Jeri E. made two weeks after the last incident; (2) an expert improperly expressed an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10999 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Hoppe
Laskowski to testify to Bowman’s statements implicating all three defendants. On the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
Laskowski to testify to Bowman’s statements implicating all three defendants. On the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
State v. Corey O. Mackin
Laskowski to testify to Bowman’s statements implicating all three defendants. On the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
Laskowski to testify to Bowman’s statements implicating all three defendants. On the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rubin E. Ards
court properly allowed Dotson’s statements to police into evidence as excited utterances, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
court properly allowed Dotson’s statements to police into evidence as excited utterances, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
State v. James D.S.
and Wydeven as witnesses to the victim’s statements. James D.S. objected to that testimony as hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10969 - 2005-03-31
and Wydeven as witnesses to the victim’s statements. James D.S. objected to that testimony as hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10969 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2 ("Kathy") gave a statement to police implicating Hanson in McLean's murder. In November
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
2 ("Kathy") gave a statement to police implicating Hanson in McLean's murder. In November
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241676 - 2019-06-05
State v. Morris F. Clement
was based in part on a written statement by Clement’s probation agent: “[a] statement by Agent Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5969 - 2005-03-31
was based in part on a written statement by Clement’s probation agent: “[a] statement by Agent Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5969 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31
by concluding that a hearsay statement exculpating Lockett was not a statement against penal interest under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31