Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 16449 for commentating.
COURT OF APPEALS
was necessary.” He continued: The only comment that the court made as it relates to the DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-05-28
was necessary.” He continued: The only comment that the court made as it relates to the DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
wanted to comment on a couple of [statements in the staff report that] the base was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50544 - 2014-09-15
wanted to comment on a couple of [statements in the staff report that] the base was removed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50544 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” as it was used by the prosecutor. The prosecutor’s comments about the labia swabs, when read in context, make
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106834 - 2017-09-21
” as it was used by the prosecutor. The prosecutor’s comments about the labia swabs, when read in context, make
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106834 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
range of sentence, and I’m satisfied, again, that based on all my findings and comments, that a medium
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173732 - 2017-09-21
range of sentence, and I’m satisfied, again, that based on all my findings and comments, that a medium
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173732 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The County fails to address a comment in the Restatement § 24 which suggests that the pertinent question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15
. The County fails to address a comment in the Restatement § 24 which suggests that the pertinent question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 84
. She further commented that No. 2011AP989-D 11 Attorney Martin's sanction memorandum
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15
. She further commented that No. 2011AP989-D 11 Attorney Martin's sanction memorandum
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Walters
and suggestibility “because it invades the province of the jury and is testimony commenting on the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4192 - 2017-09-19
and suggestibility “because it invades the province of the jury and is testimony commenting on the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 169
. However, the judge, the prosecutor and Wery’s counsel discussed the issue and commented on the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29338 - 2014-09-15
. However, the judge, the prosecutor and Wery’s counsel discussed the issue and commented on the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29338 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” This argument is frivolous. In context, the circuit court’s comment is clearly a reference to Sheri’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219941 - 2018-09-27
.’” This argument is frivolous. In context, the circuit court’s comment is clearly a reference to Sheri’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219941 - 2018-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record why the DNA surcharge ordered was necessary.” He continued: The only comment that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95671 - 2014-09-15
on the record why the DNA surcharge ordered was necessary.” He continued: The only comment that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95671 - 2014-09-15