Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tillman, 2005 WI App 71, ¶14, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05
Andree Gentry v. Susan J. Wilson, M.D.
is de novo. Id. ¶9 The following facts are undisputed. The date of injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2614 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. Id. ¶9 The following facts are undisputed. The date of injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2614 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103423 - 2013-10-29
to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103423 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Melvin Beasley
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 132, 473 N.W.2d 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8471 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 126, 132, 473 N.W.2d 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8471 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sheila K. LaFortune
de novo. State v. Erickson, 2003 WI App 43, ¶4, 260 Wis. 2d 279, 659 N.W.2d 407. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
de novo. State v. Erickson, 2003 WI App 43, ¶4, 260 Wis. 2d 279, 659 N.W.2d 407. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Brett A. Brobeck
enhancer was in violation of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, STATS., is a question of law, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13980 - 2014-09-15
enhancer was in violation of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, STATS., is a question of law, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we decide de novo. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d at 266-67. ¶5 A defendant alleging ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15
that we decide de novo. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d at 266-67. ¶5 A defendant alleging ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89675 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Encarnacion F.
. However, whether a stop or search was reasonable, given those facts, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14501 - 2017-09-21
. However, whether a stop or search was reasonable, given those facts, is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14501 - 2017-09-21
Fethiye F. Uygur v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.
We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16170 - 2005-03-31
We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16170 - 2005-03-31