Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review de novo. Id. ¶4 Earl was represented at trial by Attorney Jeffrey Jensen. Earl first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Id. ¶4 Earl was represented at trial by Attorney Jeffrey Jensen. Earl first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the premises, contract interpretation presents a question of law, which I review de novo. See Town Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173629 - 2017-09-21
of the premises, contract interpretation presents a question of law, which I review de novo. See Town Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are procedurally barred is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶14. ¶5 In his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197488 - 2017-10-10
are procedurally barred is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶14. ¶5 In his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197488 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶6 To be entitled to resentencing, Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107984 - 2017-09-21
court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶6 To be entitled to resentencing, Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
919. We review de novo whether applying the statute to a particular fact situation deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179943 - 2017-09-21
919. We review de novo whether applying the statute to a particular fact situation deprives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
inaccurate. 2 See State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106, ¶46, 313 Wis. 2d 39, 756 N.W.2d 423. We review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220074 - 2018-10-03
inaccurate. 2 See State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106, ¶46, 313 Wis. 2d 39, 756 N.W.2d 423. We review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220074 - 2018-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
court, and our review is de novo. Pinter v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2000 WI 75, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31433 - 2008-01-09
court, and our review is de novo. Pinter v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2000 WI 75, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31433 - 2008-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03