Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 58500 for speedy trial.

State v. Jimmie L. Perkins
. §§ 943.11 and 939.05 (2001-02).[3] He argues that because the trial court failed to explain why it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rudolfo Briseno
of a controlled substance (marijuana). He challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9408 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
of force.1 The trial court imposed an aggregate sentence of thirty-seven years, comprised of thirty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49298 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
retrieved a projectile bullet casing from his hair. Rivera waived his right to a jury trial and instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715855 - 2023-10-17

[PDF] State v. Warren J. Pik
postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. Pik claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8991 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John E. Isom v. Jeffrey Endicott
Because Isom has an adequate remedy at law in another pending appeal, the trial court was correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
for a prescriptive easement on Burnell Spuhler’s property. Landon raises several claims of trial error. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101244 - 2013-08-27

[PDF] State v. Warren J. Pik
postconviction motion seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. Pik claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8992 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Buckley J. Kain v. Shelly L. Kain
of the couple’s two daughters. She argues that the trial court erred by failing to apply § 767.325(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13832 - 2014-09-15

Buckley J. Kain v. Shelly L. Kain
Buckley Kain primary physical placement of the couple’s two daughters. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13832 - 2005-03-31