Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Manitowoc County v. Denise G.
we conclude that posttermination relief is precluded by statute, the trial court was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9937 - 2017-09-19
we conclude that posttermination relief is precluded by statute, the trial court was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9937 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying postconviction relief. He contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to tell him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189358 - 2017-09-21
denying postconviction relief. He contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to tell him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189358 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Suzanne Marie Johnson v. Norman T. Johnson
payment to his former wife, Suzanne, from $14,236.04 to $41,323.00. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
payment to his former wife, Suzanne, from $14,236.04 to $41,323.00. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appellate issues: (1) whether the evidence at Lane’s jury trial was sufficient to support his convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103604 - 2017-09-21
appellate issues: (1) whether the evidence at Lane’s jury trial was sufficient to support his convictions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to deny his postconviction motion without a hearing based on his allegation that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692962 - 2023-08-22
decision to deny his postconviction motion without a hearing based on his allegation that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692962 - 2023-08-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial; and (2) new evidence exists warranting a new trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
trial; and (2) new evidence exists warranting a new trial. This court affirms. I. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918735 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
State v. Donny Rogers
. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. BROWN, J. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7968 - 2017-09-19
. Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. BROWN, J. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7968 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeremy Armstrong
. See Wis. Stat. § 940.02 (1995-96).[1] Armstrong argues: (1) that the trial court erred in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14178 - 2005-03-31
. See Wis. Stat. § 940.02 (1995-96).[1] Armstrong argues: (1) that the trial court erred in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14178 - 2005-03-31
WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1275-CR Complete Title...
(1980).[2] He also argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94202 - 2013-04-23
(1980).[2] He also argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94202 - 2013-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2009-10).[2] Vento contends that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97057 - 2013-06-02
to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2009-10).[2] Vento contends that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97057 - 2013-06-02