Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 72989 for we.
Search results 12451 - 12460 of 72989 for we.
State v. John J. Watson
on the sexual-motivation issue. We conclude that it did not. We therefore reverse the court’s ruling
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8931 - 2005-03-31
on the sexual-motivation issue. We conclude that it did not. We therefore reverse the court’s ruling
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8931 - 2005-03-31
Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
. ¶2 We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16317 - 2005-03-31
. ¶2 We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
received a full and fair trial on her claim. We agree. We therefore reverse the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52856 - 2014-09-15
received a full and fair trial on her claim. We agree. We therefore reverse the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52856 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Anthony Keller v. Barbara Keller
that we should reverse the court’s decision to deny her motion to modify placement. 1 ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4559 - 2017-09-20
that we should reverse the court’s decision to deny her motion to modify placement. 1 ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4559 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation of WIS. STAT. §§ 939.62(1) and 973.01(2)(c), we conclude that a court may apply a penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113843 - 2017-09-21
interpretation of WIS. STAT. §§ 939.62(1) and 973.01(2)(c), we conclude that a court may apply a penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113843 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
we conclude the Town substantially complied with this procedure, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46056 - 2010-01-19
we conclude the Town substantially complied with this procedure, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46056 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
State v. William C. Hartwig
and was competent to proceed pro se. We conclude that the record does not reveal an No. 95-0177-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8532 - 2017-09-19
and was competent to proceed pro se. We conclude that the record does not reveal an No. 95-0177-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8532 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
prior appellate counsel testified. We affirm the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20010 - 2017-09-21
prior appellate counsel testified. We affirm the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the order granting summary judgment to the City of New Berlin. We agree with the City that certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115439 - 2017-09-21
the order granting summary judgment to the City of New Berlin. We agree with the City that certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115439 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey Kenneth Krohn
Krohn requests that we vacate the restitution order and also asks that, as a result of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4154 - 2005-03-31
Krohn requests that we vacate the restitution order and also asks that, as a result of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4154 - 2005-03-31