Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12461 - 12470 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 12461 - 12470 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. Donny Rogers
. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial for murder, the State of Wisconsin wants to introduce an inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7968 - 2005-03-31
. At Donny Rogers's upcoming trial for murder, the State of Wisconsin wants to introduce an inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7968 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2009-10).[2] Vento contends that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97057 - 2013-06-02
to Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2009-10).[2] Vento contends that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97057 - 2013-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2011AP2432-CR 2 pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
No. 2011AP2432-CR 2 pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88395 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to withdraw his guilty pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22
is entitled to withdraw his guilty pleas because his trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88395 - 2012-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 The Honorable Glenn H. Yamahiro presided over the trial and issued the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97057 - 2014-09-15
. 1 The Honorable Glenn H. Yamahiro presided over the trial and issued the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97057 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel E. Ball
. On appeal, Ball makes three arguments: (1) the trial court’s denial of a mistrial for witness tampering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15073 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, Ball makes three arguments: (1) the trial court’s denial of a mistrial for witness tampering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15073 - 2005-03-31
Ronald A. Arthur v. Randy Keefe
Arthur then filed a “severed complaint” and Doyle moved to dismiss that as well. In response, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
Arthur then filed a “severed complaint” and Doyle moved to dismiss that as well. In response, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
Tony Walker v. Department of Corrections
CURIAM. Tony Walker, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Tony Walker, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
the stipulation, it is not valid. Ardell did not timely appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
the stipulation, it is not valid. Ardell did not timely appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19570 - 2005-09-13
Charles D. Kramer v. Paula L. Kramer
tax return for 1999. Because the parties were married for only nine months, the trial court attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4892 - 2005-03-31
tax return for 1999. Because the parties were married for only nine months, the trial court attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4892 - 2005-03-31