Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12461 - 12470 of 73644 for we.
Search results 12461 - 12470 of 73644 for we.
State v. Jeffrey Kenneth Krohn
Krohn requests that we vacate the restitution order and also asks that, as a result of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4154 - 2005-03-31
Krohn requests that we vacate the restitution order and also asks that, as a result of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4154 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed the award. Prent then filed this appeal. As we explain, Prent’s argument on appeal does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
affirmed the award. Prent then filed this appeal. As we explain, Prent’s argument on appeal does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79223 - 2012-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Sandy Pegues
a circuit court order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20983 - 2017-09-21
a circuit court order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the original sentencing. We conclude that resentencing is not warranted because the revocation judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
of the original sentencing. We conclude that resentencing is not warranted because the revocation judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Vadim Katznelson v. Stuart Hoffman
of action required expert testimony. For the reasons discussed more fully below, we agree with Katznelson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9623 - 2017-09-19
of action required expert testimony. For the reasons discussed more fully below, we agree with Katznelson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9623 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sandy Pegues
Pegues appeals pro se from a circuit court order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20983 - 2006-01-24
Pegues appeals pro se from a circuit court order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20983 - 2006-01-24
State v. Fredrick E. Jones
juror and when it allowed the sheriff’s department to add deputies to the courtroom. Because we discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19803 - 2005-10-03
juror and when it allowed the sheriff’s department to add deputies to the courtroom. Because we discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19803 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
Lindsay Mosher v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
of Dr. Paul Dvorak and the testimony Dr. Lawrence Lockman. Because we conclude that the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15114 - 2017-09-21
of Dr. Paul Dvorak and the testimony Dr. Lawrence Lockman. Because we conclude that the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15114 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bryan Gary
) the State breached the plea agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
) the State breached the plea agreement; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective. We conclude the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19309 - 2005-08-15
COURT OF APPEALS
unlawfully detained the vehicle in which Klang was a passenger. We disagree and affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04
unlawfully detained the vehicle in which Klang was a passenger. We disagree and affirm the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04