Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12471 - 12480 of 63608 for records/1000.
Search results 12471 - 12480 of 63608 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP2027-CRNM 2 We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830231 - 2024-07-23
. No. 2023AP2027-CRNM 2 We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830231 - 2024-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP915-CRNM 2 reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939645 - 2025-04-15
. No. 2023AP915-CRNM 2 reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939645 - 2025-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253647 - 2020-02-12
. He has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253647 - 2020-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566573 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
into the residence. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050789 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Zack
exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven Zack. Because the records show that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15872 - 2017-09-21
exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven Zack. Because the records show that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479281 - 2022-02-01
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479281 - 2022-02-01
Susan Bauer v. Dawn Willison
for a writ of mandamus to compel the clerk of the DeForest municipal court to “forward the record for appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14378 - 2005-03-31
for a writ of mandamus to compel the clerk of the DeForest municipal court to “forward the record for appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14378 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven J. Zack
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15872 - 2005-03-31
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15872 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20