Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12481 - 12490 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12481 - 12490 of 30123 for de.
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
was in violation of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, Stats., is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15440 - 2005-03-31
was in violation of §§ 939.62 and 973.12, Stats., is a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15440 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424, 576 N.W.2d 912
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33533 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424, 576 N.W.2d 912
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33533 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony Harris
de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). Terry v. Ohio, 392
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9176 - 2005-03-31
de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). Terry v. Ohio, 392
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9176 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn E. Avery
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements is a question of law we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d 190, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120938 - 2014-09-09
requirements is a question of law we review de novo. K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139 Wis. 2d 190, 198, 407 N.W.2d 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120938 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
WI 66, ¶26, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review de novo whether a defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
WI 66, ¶26, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review de novo whether a defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
State v. Yathzee D. Inman
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a given factual scenario is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346201 - 2021-03-16
a given factual scenario is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346201 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9933 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9933 - 2017-09-19