Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12481 - 12490 of 50071 for our.
Search results 12481 - 12490 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, for failing to seek a plea withdrawal at the time of sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
, for failing to seek a plea withdrawal at the time of sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration of that order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
motion for reconsideration of that order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report, response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105620 - 2013-12-17
consideration of the report, response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the orders may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105620 - 2013-12-17
CA Blank Order
an order denying his claims for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112161 - 2014-05-06
an order denying his claims for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112161 - 2014-05-06
CA Blank Order
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98122 - 2013-06-10
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98122 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2311 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258398 - 2020-04-23
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258398 - 2020-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a reversible error. Our review of summary judgment is de novo, Neis, 349 Wis. 2d 461, ΒΆ15, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112697 - 2017-09-21
a reversible error. Our review of summary judgment is de novo, Neis, 349 Wis. 2d 461, ΒΆ15, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112697 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was an erroneous exercise of discretion or otherwise failed to consider the best interests of the child. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192180 - 2017-09-21
was an erroneous exercise of discretion or otherwise failed to consider the best interests of the child. Our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192180 - 2017-09-21