Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12491 - 12500 of 82980 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Dean T. Schaefer
to the United States Constitution protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7597 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the stop and search of Polhamus’ vehicle before Geier ordered the towing. From these assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247417 - 2019-09-26

[PDF] Village of McFarland v. Dennis L. Preston
to the United States Constitution does not prohibit such an expansion of the investigation in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11275 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and permanent disability benefits. Id., ¶20. Consequently, we must search the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42500 - 2009-10-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures.” State v. Artic, 2010 WI 83, ¶28, 327
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98223 - 2013-09-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). We may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76882 - 2014-09-15

State v. Dean T. Schaefer
unreasonable searches and seizures.” While an investigative stop is technically a “seizure” under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7596 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kelsey C.R.
that the person is not armed. Accordingly, he asked a female police officer to meet them to do a pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16246 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the particular facts and circumstances of the case.” Id., ¶20 (footnote omitted). Whether Tillman’s procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44870 - 2009-12-21

Village of McFarland v. Dennis L. Preston
does not prohibit such an expansion of the investigation in this case; and (2) the officer had reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11275 - 2005-03-31