Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12491 - 12500 of 72987 for we.

State v. Angel E.
be terminated; and (2) whether § 48.415(2)(c) is unconstitutional. We conclude that Angel was denied due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9885 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andrew L. Reiman
at an erroneous decision to suppress Gilbertson’s statements. We conclude the State has failed to meet its burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21404 - 2006-02-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and from an order denying his motion for reconsideration. 1 We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191650 - 2017-09-21

State v. Branko Cvorovic
inside Cvorovic’s pocket during the frisk, and no basis to search his car. We hold that Cvorovic’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3080 - 2005-03-31

James Elmer Lefeber v. Bonnie Jean Lefeber
support provisions of the judgment. Although we conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8746 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gerald T. Schaetz v. Town of Scott
map but because ch. 236 does not apply to the petition, the petition must be dismissed. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13792 - 2014-09-15

County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
granted the motion because it concluded that the police did not have probable cause to arrest. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31

Gary A. Miller v. Jodi Lynn Ehrke
that the attorneys’ fees portion of the damage award was error because the fees were unreasonable. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6290 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because it was involuntary. We affirm. Background ¶2 On March 28, 2017, Racine police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726452 - 2023-11-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and by concluding it did not have the power to equitably relocate the easement. We affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02