Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1251 - 1260 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 1251 - 1260 of 65039 for timed.
COURT OF APPEALS
and convicted of incest. The victim was his biological daughter, Delores, who was sixteen years old at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53745 - 2010-08-25
and convicted of incest. The victim was his biological daughter, Delores, who was sixteen years old at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53745 - 2010-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
: [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: [A]t some point in time did you ask for permission to search him? [WILSON]: Yes, I did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33393 - 2008-07-14
: [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: [A]t some point in time did you ask for permission to search him? [WILSON]: Yes, I did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33393 - 2008-07-14
Harry T. Staver v. Milwaukee County
from the time of his retirement until the time it was determined that he was to receive free health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21220 - 2006-03-22
from the time of his retirement until the time it was determined that he was to receive free health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21220 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
Harry T. Staver v. Milwaukee County
payment, plus interest, for the health insurance premiums he paid from the time of his retirement until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21220 - 2017-09-21
payment, plus interest, for the health insurance premiums he paid from the time of his retirement until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21220 - 2017-09-21
William J. Toman v. Pamela A. Polenz
, 2001. They have two children, one born in 1991 and the other in 1993. At the time of the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20634 - 2005-12-14
, 2001. They have two children, one born in 1991 and the other in 1993. At the time of the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20634 - 2005-12-14
Edward Frank Finn v. Debra M. Finn
judgment and remand the cause for further fact finding.[2] BACKGROUND ¶2 At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15081 - 2005-03-31
judgment and remand the cause for further fact finding.[2] BACKGROUND ¶2 At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Edward Frank Finn v. Debra M. Finn
BACKGROUND ¶2 At the time of their divorce on October 5, 1998, Debra and Edward had been married
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
BACKGROUND ¶2 At the time of their divorce on October 5, 1998, Debra and Edward had been married
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
that the City be prohibited from arguing that Bell was impaired at the time of the offense; (3) instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21
that the City be prohibited from arguing that Bell was impaired at the time of the offense; (3) instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
that the City be prohibited from arguing that Bell was impaired at the time of the offense; (3) instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31
that the City be prohibited from arguing that Bell was impaired at the time of the offense; (3) instructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31
State v. La Rae J. Schell
ordering home monitoring for a probationer ordered to serve jail time as a probation condition. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2005-03-31
ordering home monitoring for a probationer ordered to serve jail time as a probation condition. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2005-03-31