Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1251 - 1260 of 58307 for us.

[PDF] How to Collect and Analyze Data: A Manual for Sheriffs and Jail Administrators
of Corrections reserves the right to reproduce, publish, translate, or otherwise use and to authorize others
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/manualsheriffjailadmin.pdf - 2022-12-21

[PDF] Building High Quality Connections for Success
Use in Office Day-to-day Staff Meetings Performance Management Use with Stakeholders
/services/attorney/docs/leadingwithengagement.pdf - 2026-02-11

COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court used the wrong figures for calculating the amount he needed to pay Melinda to equalize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64058 - 2011-05-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court used the wrong figures for calculating the amount he needed to pay Melinda to equalize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64058 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
for its cell sites between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1988 was not exempt from sales and use tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11930 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
and collection of state taxes on fuel used by its truck fleet. Roehl claimed that fuel consumed while its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] R.W. Docks & Slips v. State
unless the regulatory action in question deprives a property owner of all economically beneficial use
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17563 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
$1,707.51 for taxable costs and disbursements. Omegbu claims that: (1) the court improperly used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31591 - 2008-01-22

R.W. Docks & Slips v. State
unless the regulatory action in question deprives a property owner of all economically beneficial use
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17563 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(“the DSPS”). The notice required Premium Properties to submit building change of use plans and fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710629 - 2023-10-03