Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 30123 for de.
Mary Ann Strnad v. Edward Strnad
that it was subject to division under Wis. Stat. § 767.255. We reject Edward’s “de minimus” argument.[4] Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4220 - 2005-03-31
that it was subject to division under Wis. Stat. § 767.255. We reject Edward’s “de minimus” argument.[4] Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Breitzman, 378 Wis. 2d 431, ¶¶37-39. We reject Jones’s claim because he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
that we review de novo. Breitzman, 378 Wis. 2d 431, ¶¶37-39. We reject Jones’s claim because he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Jordan
on accurate information is a constitutional issue presenting a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21549 - 2017-09-21
on accurate information is a constitutional issue presenting a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21549 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but the application of constitutional principles to those findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113853 - 2017-09-21
, but the application of constitutional principles to those findings is reviewed de novo. See id., 2008 WI App 166
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
whether a claim based on a statute is procedurally barred, this court reviews the case de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33191 - 2014-09-15
whether a claim based on a statute is procedurally barred, this court reviews the case de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33191 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Willard. Willard then sought de novo review of that decision in the circuit court. The following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202505 - 2017-11-15
Willard. Willard then sought de novo review of that decision in the circuit court. The following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202505 - 2017-11-15
City of Chippewa Falls v. Town of Hallie
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis.2d 598, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15316 - 2005-03-31
of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kirch, 222 Wis.2d 598, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15316 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, and we review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27
erroneous, and we review de novo whether those facts are sufficient to create reasonable suspicion. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31947 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31968 - 2008-02-27