Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 41710 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 41710 for jury duty/1000.
James D. Luedtke v. Roger A. Luedtke
request for a jury trial, (2) in conducting the small claims proceedings by telephone, and (3) in handling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11336 - 2005-03-31
request for a jury trial, (2) in conducting the small claims proceedings by telephone, and (3) in handling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Warner Davis
appeals from a judgment of conviction, following jury trial, for second-degree reckless injury, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8765 - 2017-09-19
appeals from a judgment of conviction, following jury trial, for second-degree reckless injury, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8765 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
intentional homicide in 1980 after a jury trial. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Schwartz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2014-07-08
intentional homicide in 1980 after a jury trial. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Schwartz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116161 - 2014-07-08
State v. William Warner Davis
. PER CURIAM. William Warner Davis appeals from a judgment of conviction, following jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8765 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. William Warner Davis appeals from a judgment of conviction, following jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Schwartz was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide in 1980 after a jury trial. His conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
Schwartz was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide in 1980 after a jury trial. His conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116161 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Harris argues that the instruction provided to the jury on the intimidation charge did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330579 - 2021-02-02
motion. Harris argues that the instruction provided to the jury on the intimidation charge did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330579 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion. Harris argues that the instruction provided to the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330583 - 2021-02-02
his postconviction motion. Harris argues that the instruction provided to the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330583 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
City of New Berlin v. Kenneth Pollich
that the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury verdict. He further contends that because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8761 - 2017-09-19
that the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury verdict. He further contends that because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8761 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Audrey A. Edmunds
the trial, and a jury instruction. Because we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14327 - 2014-09-15
the trial, and a jury instruction. Because we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14327 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
ten days. The sanctions included forfeiture of a right to a jury trial; forfeiture of jury fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47154 - 2010-02-17
ten days. The sanctions included forfeiture of a right to a jury trial; forfeiture of jury fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47154 - 2010-02-17