Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 63986 for records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
Debra Schultz v. Daniel P. Schultz
This is an expedited appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS. No(s). 99-0668-FT 2 that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15245 - 2017-09-21
This is an expedited appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS. No(s). 99-0668-FT 2 that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15245 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
investigation (PSI) and the State. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209394 - 2018-03-06
investigation (PSI) and the State. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209394 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
the Petitioner directly or indirectly upon the record to justify their individual acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21
the Petitioner directly or indirectly upon the record to justify their individual acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101731 - 2013-09-10
not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101731 - 2013-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244530 - 2019-08-07
has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244530 - 2019-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873996 - 2024-11-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
an independent review of the Record as mandated by WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878571 - 2024-11-20
Ronald A. Arthur v. Randy Keefe
is without support in the record. There is no record of Arthur petitioning the court to advance this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
is without support in the record. There is no record of Arthur petitioning the court to advance this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31