Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 20304 for sai.
Search results 12501 - 12510 of 20304 for sai.
[PDF]
Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
is clear on its face: it says $75 per hour. Because the statute was enacted in 1985, it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14066 - 2014-09-15
is clear on its face: it says $75 per hour. Because the statute was enacted in 1985, it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14066 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sara L. Lohry
does not say. We could easily dispose of this argument by noting that appellate courts need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6789 - 2005-03-31
does not say. We could easily dispose of this argument by noting that appellate courts need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6789 - 2005-03-31
City of New Berlin v. Dennis Barker
evidence that is “clear, satisfactory and convincing.” We say this because this burden has been applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6137 - 2005-03-31
evidence that is “clear, satisfactory and convincing.” We say this because this burden has been applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The postconviction court acknowledged the DOC’s letter and stated “[i]t is a very confusing sentencing, to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223918 - 2018-10-23
. The postconviction court acknowledged the DOC’s letter and stated “[i]t is a very confusing sentencing, to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223918 - 2018-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance without the contract—which is to say, whenever such misperformance involves a foreseeable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699541 - 2023-09-06
performance without the contract—which is to say, whenever such misperformance involves a foreseeable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699541 - 2023-09-06
State v. Sheila L. Hardnett
didn’t say that. The court’s questions could suggest a disapproval of disability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12545 - 2005-03-31
didn’t say that. The court’s questions could suggest a disapproval of disability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12545 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
early.” Johnikin contends that these remarks are inaccurate because “there are not any rules that say
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
early.” Johnikin contends that these remarks are inaccurate because “there are not any rules that say
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and then you say, whoops, but that person should be excluded.” ¶20 However, Tipton renewed his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955435 - 2025-05-13
, and then you say, whoops, but that person should be excluded.” ¶20 However, Tipton renewed his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955435 - 2025-05-13
State v. Kevin L. C.
went on to say that Lindsay told Melissa “I’m not going to lie.” Other witnesses’ statements would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
went on to say that Lindsay told Melissa “I’m not going to lie.” Other witnesses’ statements would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dequelvin M. Douglas
. The expert did not say anything that the jury could not already discern from the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12005 - 2017-09-21
. The expert did not say anything that the jury could not already discern from the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12005 - 2017-09-21