Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 83412 for civil case no. "90-77".
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 83412 for civil case no. "90-77".
[PDF]
Marvin Tomlin v. Langlade County
in favor of Tomlin in the amount of $457.25. The County appealed, and this court remanded the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3935 - 2017-09-20
in favor of Tomlin in the amount of $457.25. The County appealed, and this court remanded the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3935 - 2017-09-20
State v. Daniel J. Beck
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10566 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10566 - 2005-03-31
Certification
, JJ. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34826 - 2008-12-09
, JJ. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.61 this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34826 - 2008-12-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562809 - 2022-09-07
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562809 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. This case arises from a dispute over the planned removal of a driveway connecting a highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147002 - 2017-09-21
CURIAM. This case arises from a dispute over the planned removal of a driveway connecting a highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147002 - 2017-09-21
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
. Appeal Nos. 04-0509 04-0510 04-0511 Cir. Ct. Nos. 02TP000080 02TP000081 02TP000082 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7329 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal Nos. 04-0509 04-0510 04-0511 Cir. Ct. Nos. 02TP000080 02TP000081 02TP000082 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7329 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
. Appeal Nos. 04-0509 04-0510 04-0511 Cir. Ct. Nos. 02TP000080 02TP000081 02TP000082 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7328 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal Nos. 04-0509 04-0510 04-0511 Cir. Ct. Nos. 02TP000080 02TP000081 02TP000082 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7328 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Beck
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10566 - 2017-09-20
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10566 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
?” No. 2006AP2045 4 A. Sufficiency of Evidence ¶5 The first issue in this case is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30011 - 2014-09-15
?” No. 2006AP2045 4 A. Sufficiency of Evidence ¶5 The first issue in this case is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30011 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” It also said: “This case involved extremely serious crimes and it required serious punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112199 - 2017-09-21
.” It also said: “This case involved extremely serious crimes and it required serious punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112199 - 2017-09-21