Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 50107 for our.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 50107 for our.
State v. Justin H.
.” On appeal, Justin observes that our law requires placement to be the least restrictive environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9426 - 2005-03-31
.” On appeal, Justin observes that our law requires placement to be the least restrictive environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enhancements. Williams responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100156 - 2017-09-21
enhancements. Williams responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stephan E. Yoder, Jr.
for the purpose of this appeal, we need not look beyond the plain language of the statute in reaching our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8812 - 2017-09-19
for the purpose of this appeal, we need not look beyond the plain language of the statute in reaching our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8812 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
array was inadmissible hearsay. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100884 - 2017-09-21
array was inadmissible hearsay. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100884 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2312 - 2017-09-19
summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in this court in light of Prihoda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2312 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that he is entitled to sentence modification on the basis of a new factor. Upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422193 - 2021-09-08
contends that he is entitled to sentence modification on the basis of a new factor. Upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422193 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reasonable suspicion for the stop. No. 2019AP119-CR 2 Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249879 - 2019-11-07
reasonable suspicion for the stop. No. 2019AP119-CR 2 Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249879 - 2019-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984). ¶12 Although our decision in this opinion is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32471 - 2008-04-16
. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984). ¶12 Although our decision in this opinion is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32471 - 2008-04-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
on our statement in Lopez that de novo review is applicable “when the issue before the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28347 - 2014-09-15
on our statement in Lopez that de novo review is applicable “when the issue before the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978). Our review is limited to the trial court’s sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101901 - 2017-09-21
376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978). Our review is limited to the trial court’s sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101901 - 2017-09-21