Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 50107 for our.

COURT OF APPEALS
action, so we have no way of knowing, on our de novo review, whether the circuit court correctly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77510 - 2012-02-06

CA Blank Order
her pleas. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107554 - 2014-01-27

State v. Ruven Seibert
that the report itself must contain a discussion of a less restrictive placement. Our review of the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513148 - 2022-04-27

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins with a “presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95127 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258398 - 2020-04-23

State v. Justin H.
.” On appeal, Justin observes that our law requires placement to be the least restrictive environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9426 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
enhancements. Williams responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100156 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Stephan E. Yoder, Jr.
for the purpose of this appeal, we need not look beyond the plain language of the statute in reaching our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8812 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
array was inadmissible hearsay. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100884 - 2017-09-21