Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 12511 - 12520 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Ronald A. Arthur v. Randy Keefe
Arthur then filed a “severed complaint” and Doyle moved to dismiss that as well. In response, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
Arthur then filed a “severed complaint” and Doyle moved to dismiss that as well. In response, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
found guilty of disorderly conduct following a court trial. She contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287688 - 2020-09-16
found guilty of disorderly conduct following a court trial. She contends the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287688 - 2020-09-16
State v. Marlon Spears
denying his postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12039 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12039 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marlon Spears
denying his postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11659 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11659 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marlon Spears
postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to impeach the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11659 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing to impeach the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11659 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Samuel E. Ball
. On appeal, Ball makes three arguments: (1) the trial court’s denial of a mistrial for witness tampering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15073 - 2017-09-21
. On appeal, Ball makes three arguments: (1) the trial court’s denial of a mistrial for witness tampering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15073 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David A. H.
witness from trial. We conclude that No. 01-0270-CR 2 the trial court properly exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
witness from trial. We conclude that No. 01-0270-CR 2 the trial court properly exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Charles D. Kramer v. Paula L. Kramer
to sign a joint tax return for 1999. Because the parties were married for only nine months, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4892 - 2017-09-19
to sign a joint tax return for 1999. Because the parties were married for only nine months, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4892 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ed Cody, Jr. v. Michael Weygandt
No. 2004AP2973 2 still disputed material facts requiring trial. We conclude the trial court acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20084 - 2017-09-21
No. 2004AP2973 2 still disputed material facts requiring trial. We conclude the trial court acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20084 - 2017-09-21
Tony Walker v. Department of Corrections
CURIAM. Tony Walker, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Tony Walker, pro se, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15834 - 2005-03-31