Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12521 - 12530 of 98601 for civil court case status online.
Search results 12521 - 12530 of 98601 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
Jose DeJesus Fuentes v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1534-W Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17405 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1534-W Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17405 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael Gisvold
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE August 25, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13451 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE August 25, 1998 This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13451 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Lee Laxton
2002 WI 82 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3164 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17576 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 82 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3164 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17576 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
interests. LaPean’s case was tried before a jury, which found him guilty. LaPean moved the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2013-09-25
interests. LaPean’s case was tried before a jury, which found him guilty. LaPean moved the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2013-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
job didn’t produce as much as it did back in 2008. The Court: So it wasn’t the case where you thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-30
job didn’t produce as much as it did back in 2008. The Court: So it wasn’t the case where you thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145386 - 2015-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28603 - 2007-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28603 - 2007-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶9 The City moved for summary judgment in both cases. The circuit court granted the City’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63795 - 2011-06-08
. ¶9 The City moved for summary judgment in both cases. The circuit court granted the City’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63795 - 2011-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 16, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2006-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 16, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47973 - 2006-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2007-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112662 - 2007-02-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard of review, the majority concludes that case law requires that we reverse the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27614 - 2014-09-15
standard of review, the majority concludes that case law requires that we reverse the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27614 - 2014-09-15