Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12521 - 12530 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12521 - 12530 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
would have been different.” Rockette, 294 Wis. 2d 611, ¶40. We review de novo whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144477 - 2015-07-15
would have been different.” Rockette, 294 Wis. 2d 611, ¶40. We review de novo whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144477 - 2015-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
requirement of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78849 - 2012-02-29
requirement of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78849 - 2012-02-29
State v. Michael P. Fitzpatrick
constitution and of a state statute are questions of law this court decides de novo, benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17733 - 2005-04-13
constitution and of a state statute are questions of law this court decides de novo, benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17733 - 2005-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75824 - 2011-12-28
of reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75824 - 2011-12-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
on the motion. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923140 - 2025-03-05
on the motion. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923140 - 2025-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury a particular instruction is a question of law we review de novo. Giminski, 247 Wis. 2d 750, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91502 - 2013-01-14
the jury a particular instruction is a question of law we review de novo. Giminski, 247 Wis. 2d 750, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91502 - 2013-01-14
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
that we review de novo. See Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d at 639. ¶8 We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2189 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo. See Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d at 639. ¶8 We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Shelby Insurance Company v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15181 - 2017-09-21
of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15181 - 2017-09-21