Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12521 - 12530 of 50200 for our.
Search results 12521 - 12530 of 50200 for our.
CA Blank Order
to the defendant’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94666 - 2013-03-25
to the defendant’s sentence would also lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94666 - 2013-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125547 - 2017-09-21
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
he does not claim that the Halloween party incident was admitted in error, we include it in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106142 - 2017-09-21
he does not claim that the Halloween party incident was admitted in error, we include it in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106142 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Haskell directs our attention to State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 699-700, 551 N.W.2d 841 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541316 - 2022-07-07
Haskell directs our attention to State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 699-700, 551 N.W.2d 841 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541316 - 2022-07-07
[PDF]
State v. Jerry L. Cox
, 76 Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13644 - 2017-09-21
, 76 Wis.2d 277, 282, 251 N.W.2d 65, 67-68 (1977). Our review of the sentencing transcript reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13644 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that he is entitled to sentence modification on the basis of a new factor. Upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422193 - 2021-09-08
contends that he is entitled to sentence modification on the basis of a new factor. Upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422193 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the record plays in our review. As the court explained in Princess House, considering whether evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32997 - 2014-09-15
in the record plays in our review. As the court explained in Princess House, considering whether evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32997 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
886. A challenge to Edwards’ sentences also would lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101129 - 2013-08-25
886. A challenge to Edwards’ sentences also would lack arguable merit. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101129 - 2013-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
and most appropriate result. Third, our holding creates a “bright-line” test that is easy to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49298 - 2010-04-26
and most appropriate result. Third, our holding creates a “bright-line” test that is easy to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49298 - 2010-04-26
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
12, 2000, the supreme court summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2312 - 2005-03-31
12, 2000, the supreme court summarily vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2312 - 2005-03-31