Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12531 - 12540 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

City of Sheboygan v. Timothy J. Lobaugh
at the jury trial of Lobaugh’s refusal to submit to field sobriety tests. We uphold the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7014 - 2005-09-06

[PDF] State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
for refusing to submit to breath testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Stephen R. Stocki
-CR 2 right to an alternative chemical test. The trial court made a credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20824 - 2017-09-21

City of Sheboygan v. Michael J. Grohskopf
Grohskopf to submit to a preliminary breath screening test (PBT). The trial court held that a lower level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11515 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
testing. The issues on appeal are (1) whether the state lawfully arrested Kuklinski for driving under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10777 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Wade T. Jones
, the deputy asked Jones to perform field sobriety tests. ¶3 The deputy administered the alphabet test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2251 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Sheboygan v. Michael J. Grohskopf
to a preliminary breath screening test (PBT). The trial court held that a lower level of probable cause than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11515 - 2017-09-19

State v. Stephen R. Stocki
argued that he had been impermissibly denied his right to an alternative chemical test. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20824 - 2006-01-03

State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
to a polygraph, (2) failing to apply the proper test when ruling on probable cause to arrest, (3) permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6473 - 2005-03-31

State v. Milton H. Smith
refused to submit to a chemical test under the implied consent law, as well as an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31